<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Pastor Andy Langford&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pastorandylangford.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pastorandylangford.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:51:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Open Letter to United Methodists by Stan</title>
		<link>http://pastorandylangford.com/2012/05/15/an-open-letter-to-united-methodists/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pastorandylangford.wordpress.com/?p=155#comment-205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott, well said!    I share you concerns and pain about the UMC.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, well said!    I share you concerns and pain about the UMC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Open Letter to United Methodists by Scott</title>
		<link>http://pastorandylangford.com/2012/05/15/an-open-letter-to-united-methodists/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 15:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pastorandylangford.wordpress.com/?p=155#comment-204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reading this underscores the problem that is the UMC.  In the book of Revelation, there is a passage about being neither hot nor cold, and therefore being spewed out of the mouth.  That, to me, is the UMC -- neither hot nor cold.  

We have the lamentations that the church is not inclusive because it does not embrace the gay agenda that is seemingly pervading our national culture. We have the defenders of the the many institutionsand agencies that have become entrenched over the decades and that literally drain the local church of funds that could be used to evangelize.  So, what&#039;s left?  What&#039;s left is the segment of the church that truly wants to evangelize and win people to Christ.  That&#039;s the segment that gets lost in the shuffle, and consequently the UMC is looked upon as a dying church more caught up in the &quot;social justice&quot; movement than in the Great Commission.

Having been raised in a Methodist home and still being a member of a Methodist church, I have increasingly looked across the church aisles at other denominations.  I can&#039;t see myself going to any other dying, mainline denomination, and the free-for-all nature of the independent evangelical churches doesn&#039;t attract me.  I miss the great Protestant churches of the past that were commited to Christ and His call to go out into the world and preach the gospel.  I am surprised to find myself looking at what might be the re-vitalization of the Roman Catholic Church and being intrigued by the committment of certain Catholics to Christ and their fervor with bringing others to know him.  I&#039;m just not ready to &quot;cross the TIber&quot; as they say.

For now, however, I remain in the UMC pew -- confounded by the forces assailing this once great denomination, resisting strongly the pull of the national culture to dilute -- and, in some instances -- displace -- the Gospel being preached in the church, and wondering how long the UMC will remain before it, too, like other mainline denominations, is torn asunder.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading this underscores the problem that is the UMC.  In the book of Revelation, there is a passage about being neither hot nor cold, and therefore being spewed out of the mouth.  That, to me, is the UMC &#8212; neither hot nor cold.  </p>
<p>We have the lamentations that the church is not inclusive because it does not embrace the gay agenda that is seemingly pervading our national culture. We have the defenders of the the many institutionsand agencies that have become entrenched over the decades and that literally drain the local church of funds that could be used to evangelize.  So, what&#8217;s left?  What&#8217;s left is the segment of the church that truly wants to evangelize and win people to Christ.  That&#8217;s the segment that gets lost in the shuffle, and consequently the UMC is looked upon as a dying church more caught up in the &#8220;social justice&#8221; movement than in the Great Commission.</p>
<p>Having been raised in a Methodist home and still being a member of a Methodist church, I have increasingly looked across the church aisles at other denominations.  I can&#8217;t see myself going to any other dying, mainline denomination, and the free-for-all nature of the independent evangelical churches doesn&#8217;t attract me.  I miss the great Protestant churches of the past that were commited to Christ and His call to go out into the world and preach the gospel.  I am surprised to find myself looking at what might be the re-vitalization of the Roman Catholic Church and being intrigued by the committment of certain Catholics to Christ and their fervor with bringing others to know him.  I&#8217;m just not ready to &#8220;cross the TIber&#8221; as they say.</p>
<p>For now, however, I remain in the UMC pew &#8212; confounded by the forces assailing this once great denomination, resisting strongly the pull of the national culture to dilute &#8212; and, in some instances &#8212; displace &#8212; the Gospel being preached in the church, and wondering how long the UMC will remain before it, too, like other mainline denominations, is torn asunder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Open Letter to United Methodists by Lewis</title>
		<link>http://pastorandylangford.com/2012/05/15/an-open-letter-to-united-methodists/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pastorandylangford.wordpress.com/?p=155#comment-187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have a complex and compound fracture.  We have forces of self interest and bureaucratic turf battles.  We have theological and doctrinal variations that are utterly in contradiction to one another.  We have political division (red/blue).  We have jurisdictions announcing their intent to disobey the express will and action of General Conference in the area of sexuality.  We have boards and agencies that simply avoid the spirit of the law of the church through a casuistry that keeps them in business while undermining the votes of General Conference.  
The bone is hanging out of the leg and it is broken, not in one but many directions.  We are not broken, we are crushed.  
We do have a common understanding of what &quot;Disciple of Jesus Christ&quot; is.

Whether it would help or not, I doubt that Andy&#039;s suggestion will be allowed to take hold, at least similar attempts in the past have not.  I prefer giving the general conference five percent of local church revenues.  Let them live and die, rise and fall based on the giving of local churches.  The same for the Annual Conference budgets.  

Can dry bones live?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have a complex and compound fracture.  We have forces of self interest and bureaucratic turf battles.  We have theological and doctrinal variations that are utterly in contradiction to one another.  We have political division (red/blue).  We have jurisdictions announcing their intent to disobey the express will and action of General Conference in the area of sexuality.  We have boards and agencies that simply avoid the spirit of the law of the church through a casuistry that keeps them in business while undermining the votes of General Conference.<br />
The bone is hanging out of the leg and it is broken, not in one but many directions.  We are not broken, we are crushed.<br />
We do have a common understanding of what &#8220;Disciple of Jesus Christ&#8221; is.</p>
<p>Whether it would help or not, I doubt that Andy&#8217;s suggestion will be allowed to take hold, at least similar attempts in the past have not.  I prefer giving the general conference five percent of local church revenues.  Let them live and die, rise and fall based on the giving of local churches.  The same for the Annual Conference budgets.  </p>
<p>Can dry bones live?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Open Letter to United Methodists by Lewis</title>
		<link>http://pastorandylangford.com/2012/05/15/an-open-letter-to-united-methodists/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pastorandylangford.wordpress.com/?p=155#comment-186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s a great idea.  This was in the mix at General Conference.  It would make the survival of General Boards dependent on the actual well being of local congregations!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a great idea.  This was in the mix at General Conference.  It would make the survival of General Boards dependent on the actual well being of local congregations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Open Letter to United Methodists by Good News Magazine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What happened in Tampa? Reflections on General Conference</title>
		<link>http://pastorandylangford.com/2012/05/15/an-open-letter-to-united-methodists/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Good News Magazine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What happened in Tampa? Reflections on General Conference]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pastorandylangford.wordpress.com/?p=155#comment-154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] — The Rev. Andy Langford, senior minister of Central United Methodist Church in Concord, North Carolina (Link: HERE) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] — The Rev. Andy Langford, senior minister of Central United Methodist Church in Concord, North Carolina (Link: HERE) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Open Letter to United Methodists by Mt. Airy Bill</title>
		<link>http://pastorandylangford.com/2012/05/15/an-open-letter-to-united-methodists/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mt. Airy Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 01:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pastorandylangford.wordpress.com/?p=155#comment-114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m afraid the problem is with your premise:  &quot;Money is the fuel that powers our denomination.&quot;  Ironically, that expressed view is supported by your dependence on sponsorship of your blog by a Las Vegas casino, whose ad appears at the conclusion of your posting.

If our denomination is powered by money, rather than the Holy Spirit, then it should fail.  I&#039;m very sorry to say that I did not find much evidence of the Holy Spirit emanating from our denomination&#039;s leadership or delegates during my two weeks at General Conference.  The Holy Spirit was there, but outside the bar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid the problem is with your premise:  &#8220;Money is the fuel that powers our denomination.&#8221;  Ironically, that expressed view is supported by your dependence on sponsorship of your blog by a Las Vegas casino, whose ad appears at the conclusion of your posting.</p>
<p>If our denomination is powered by money, rather than the Holy Spirit, then it should fail.  I&#8217;m very sorry to say that I did not find much evidence of the Holy Spirit emanating from our denomination&#8217;s leadership or delegates during my two weeks at General Conference.  The Holy Spirit was there, but outside the bar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Open Letter to United Methodists by Keith</title>
		<link>http://pastorandylangford.com/2012/05/15/an-open-letter-to-united-methodists/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 01:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pastorandylangford.wordpress.com/?p=155#comment-111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do not think the UMC is as hopeless as stated, (if I did then I would turn in my credentials. Perhaps naively, I still believe nothing is impossible with God).
Perhaps that too is part or the majority of the problem with both the General Conference and the local church, we are reaping what we know we can control
and accomplish when God has been left out. I agree unmet monies for budgets
and apportionment&#039;s are the mainstay of most churches and conferences. However, the foundation that is crumbling is the lack of transformational Spirit 
filled clergy and laity that are hell bent on being satisfied with playing church
and being a social club than they are in being and bringing about the Kingdom
of God. We as United Methodist can not ever bring people into the church until
we ourselves (as individuals and as a church ) become so radically different than the world, that they have to see and experience it for themselves. Until then,the church is just another meeting, something to do, rather than something to be and become.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think the UMC is as hopeless as stated, (if I did then I would turn in my credentials. Perhaps naively, I still believe nothing is impossible with God).<br />
Perhaps that too is part or the majority of the problem with both the General Conference and the local church, we are reaping what we know we can control<br />
and accomplish when God has been left out. I agree unmet monies for budgets<br />
and apportionment&#8217;s are the mainstay of most churches and conferences. However, the foundation that is crumbling is the lack of transformational Spirit<br />
filled clergy and laity that are hell bent on being satisfied with playing church<br />
and being a social club than they are in being and bringing about the Kingdom<br />
of God. We as United Methodist can not ever bring people into the church until<br />
we ourselves (as individuals and as a church ) become so radically different than the world, that they have to see and experience it for themselves. Until then,the church is just another meeting, something to do, rather than something to be and become.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Open Letter to United Methodists by Pastor Andy</title>
		<link>http://pastorandylangford.com/2012/05/15/an-open-letter-to-united-methodists/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pastor Andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pastorandylangford.wordpress.com/?p=155#comment-110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Again, I assume you have read the APEX study related to the Call to Action report, which comes to the same conclusion as I.  The issue for me is that for 40 years we have had 13 (now 14) agencies with different officers with different boards with different agendas leading us in different directions, the majority of which are not related to local congregations.  It is as if a congregation, or district, or annual conference had multiple leaders/officers/agendas with no one to arbitrate (other than an every four-year meeting of 1,000 people).  What have they achieved in 40 years?  Not one year of growth in the US on any topic but requiring more money.  The issue is not money but focus and alignment.  We need all the agencies on task to achieve vital congregations.  Money is the way to catch their attention.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, I assume you have read the APEX study related to the Call to Action report, which comes to the same conclusion as I.  The issue for me is that for 40 years we have had 13 (now 14) agencies with different officers with different boards with different agendas leading us in different directions, the majority of which are not related to local congregations.  It is as if a congregation, or district, or annual conference had multiple leaders/officers/agendas with no one to arbitrate (other than an every four-year meeting of 1,000 people).  What have they achieved in 40 years?  Not one year of growth in the US on any topic but requiring more money.  The issue is not money but focus and alignment.  We need all the agencies on task to achieve vital congregations.  Money is the way to catch their attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Open Letter to United Methodists by dingo</title>
		<link>http://pastorandylangford.com/2012/05/15/an-open-letter-to-united-methodists/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dingo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 04:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pastorandylangford.wordpress.com/?p=155#comment-107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mission of the UMC is to make disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world, as per the Book of Discipline. 
In the BOD, it continues by saying that the best place for this to happen is within the local church.

So why not listen to those people who have stated the ideas, missions, and works that they are focused on locally, and stop the &quot;horn tooting&quot; with all the &quot;money money money&quot; speeches?
If the local churches cannot do the mission within their communities, regions, etc, there will not be any reason to discuss money at any level - local, all the way up to general. =(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mission of the UMC is to make disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world, as per the Book of Discipline.<br />
In the BOD, it continues by saying that the best place for this to happen is within the local church.</p>
<p>So why not listen to those people who have stated the ideas, missions, and works that they are focused on locally, and stop the &#8220;horn tooting&#8221; with all the &#8220;money money money&#8221; speeches?<br />
If the local churches cannot do the mission within their communities, regions, etc, there will not be any reason to discuss money at any level &#8211; local, all the way up to general. =(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Open Letter to United Methodists by MJ</title>
		<link>http://pastorandylangford.com/2012/05/15/an-open-letter-to-united-methodists/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 02:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pastorandylangford.wordpress.com/?p=155#comment-106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find it curious that you exempt from scrutiny the Ministerial Education Fund, the Black College Fund, Africa University Fund, the Episcopal Fund, and the Interdenominational Fund. In my experience as a pastor these agencies do no more to influence congregational vitality than the other general agencies you wish to starve. 

It is easy to blame the other general agencies for our decline, but they are not prohibiting bishops from organizing their conferences to foster congregational vitality, or keeping bishops from holding pastors accountable for effectiveness. I see no one holding the seminaries accountable for not training transformational leaders for the local church.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it curious that you exempt from scrutiny the Ministerial Education Fund, the Black College Fund, Africa University Fund, the Episcopal Fund, and the Interdenominational Fund. In my experience as a pastor these agencies do no more to influence congregational vitality than the other general agencies you wish to starve. </p>
<p>It is easy to blame the other general agencies for our decline, but they are not prohibiting bishops from organizing their conferences to foster congregational vitality, or keeping bishops from holding pastors accountable for effectiveness. I see no one holding the seminaries accountable for not training transformational leaders for the local church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
